How Corrupt Science and Globalist Agendas Deceived the World
For decades, the public has been subjected to an unrelenting campaign of fearmongering, falsely asserting that cO2, an essential gas for life on Earth, is an existential threat requiring radical economic and social transformation. This narrative, pushed by politically motivated scientists, opportunistic politicians, and globalist institutions like the World Economic Forum (WEF), is not grounded in empirical genuine science but in ideological zealotry and financial interests. The push for Net Zero, renewable energy mandates, and extreme environmental regulations has been built on manipulated data, biased research, and fearmongering tactics. The truth, as demonstrated by dissenting experts and observable reality, is that the so-called “climate crisis” is a manufactured scare tactic designed to consolidate power, redistribute wealth upward, and impose authoritarian controls under the guise of environmentalism. It’s interesting to some of us who never bought into the scam, how we lost friends, families and colleagues, labelled conspiracy theorists in our attempts to awaken others. People do not want to read, they want to be told by the mainstream propaganda news outlets first. The more one examines the evidence critically, the clearer it becomes that climate catastrophism is not a scientific movement but a secular religion, one that demands unquestioning belief in its doomsday prophecies while suppressing dissenting voices.
The foundational claim that human cO2 emissions drive catastrophic global warming collapses under scrutiny. First and foremost, cO2 is 0.04% of the earth’s atmosphere, a trace gas. But how did we even get here. I remember my science studying plant biology, photosynthesis. I remember nationwide ceremonies planting trees was the religion. Respected physicists like Dr. William Happer and astrophysicist Dr. Willie Soon have presented extensive data and repeatedly emphasized that cO2 is not a pollutant but the “gas of life,” critical for plant growth and sustaining ecosystems, only to be ignored, censored, or smeared. I lost my Facebook, Instagram and TikTok accounts for posting counternarratives to climate crisis hoax. Dr. Happer has bluntly stated that we are in a “CO2 famine,” noting that plant life thrives at much higher CO2 levels than what we currently have in the atmosphere. Similarly, Dr. Soon has debunked claims that CO2 drives extreme weather events, pointing out that hurricanes, droughts, and floods have existed long before industrialization. Geological records show that atmospheric CO2 levels have been far higher in Earth’s history without causing runaway warming, while current concentrations remain near historic lows, barely above 400 parts per million compared to prehistoric levels exceeding 7,000 ppm. Despite this, climate alarmists deliberately conflate natural climate variability with human activity, ignoring that only 3% of global CO2 emissions are anthropogenic, while the remaining 97% comes from oceans, volcanoes, and organic decomposition. Prof. Plimer has exposed the absurdity of blaming human CO2 emissions for climate change by highlighting that natural sources, such as volcanoes and ocean degassing, contribute the overwhelming majority of atmospheric CO2. These facts are inconvenient for the globalists and corporations profiting from climate hysteria, so they are buried under a mountain of propaganda. This selective framing exposes the unscientific nature of the climate emergency narrative, which relies not on evidence but on fear-driven dogma.
The corruption of climate science is further evidenced by the financial incentives behind the alarmist movement. Governments, universities, and corporations have poured trillions into climate research grants, renewable energy subsidies, and carbon trading schemes, creating a self-perpetuating industry where conclusions are predetermined to secure funding. Whistleblowers, such as those from the Climategate scandal, have revealed how data is manipulated to fit the narrative, with researchers admitting to “hiding the decline” in temperature records when they contradicted warming predictions. Meanwhile, dissenting scientists like Dr. Happer and Professor Ian Plimer, a renowned geologist, are systematically marginalised, their reputations attacked not because their science is flawed, but because it threatens the lucrative climate-industrial complex. These so-called “green solutions” are not designed for efficiency, they are designed for profit, with massive taxpayer-funded subsidies propping up a failing industry.
The renewable energy sector is a key pillar of the climate scam. Even more insidious is the political motivation behind the climate agenda. The push for “Net Zero” and renewable energy mandates is not an environmental solution but an economic and social engineering project. It is not about saving the planet, it is about imposing control. Wind turbines and solar panels, touted as clean alternatives, are demonstrably inefficient, environmentally destructive, and reliant on fossil fuel backups to maintain grid stability. Wind power, costing 21 cents per kilowatt-hour in the U.S., is five times more expensive than coal (4 cents/kWh) and requires constant conventional power support, rendering it redundant. Wind Turbines also kill massive numbers of birds, disrupt ecosystems, and generate health problems for people living nearby. Solar panels rely on toxic materials such as lead and cadmium, and have shockingly short lifespans
Solar farms, vulnerable to weather damage and land degradation, fail to provide reliable baseline energy, as seen when Britain’s largest solar facility was obliterated in a single storm. The same thing happened to a Texas multi-million solar farm. These technologies serve not as practical energy solutions but as virtue-signalling monuments, subsidised by taxpayers to enrich corporations like BlackRock, which profit from land acquisitions and government contracts.
The ultimate goal of the climate agenda is not environmental preservation but centralised control. Governments and global institutions such as the World Economic Forum (WEF) use climate policies as a means to regulate every aspect of human life, from energy consumption to food production to personal travel. Policies like smart meters, carbon tracking, and energy rationing are designed to monitor and restrict individual consumption under the pretense of sustainability. These are just the beginnings of a broader strategy to enforce compliance and eliminate personal freedoms.
The WEF’s vision of “You’ll own nothing and be happy” aligns perfectly with this scheme, where energy scarcity justifies digital surveillance, social credit systems, and the erosion of private property rights. The recent push to charge solar panel users for exporting excess energy, after luring them with promises of energy independence, exposes the scam’s true nature: a bait-and-switch to further entrench utility monopolies. The ultimate goal is a tightly controlled global economy where resources are rationed by unelected bureaucrats while elites continue to live lavish lifestyles. The hypocrisy of climate leaders flying private jets to summits while lecturing ordinary people about reducing their carbon footprint is glaring evidence of the scam at play.
The climate change movement is not science; it is a secular religion, complete with apocalyptic prophecies, heretics (skeptics), and indulgences (carbon offsets). Its high priests, politicians, billionaire activists, and corporate elites, preach sacrifice for the masses while indulging in private jets and multiple homes. The economic consequences of this fraudulent agenda are disastrous. The transition away from reliable fossil fuels toward unreliable renewables has led to soaring energy costs, economic instability, and the decline of Western industrial power. Africa and the global south with their puppet governments have been worst hit just at a time when they were accelerating modernisation and infrastructure development. Manufacturing, steel production, and essential infrastructure all depend on coal, oil, and natural gas, resources that cannot simply be replaced by wind and solar without catastrophic consequences. Countries that have aggressively pursued Net Zero policies, such as Germany and the UK, are now facing energy crises, while China and India continue expanding their coal plants without restriction. The notion that the West must self-impose economic suicide while the rest of the world ignores these policies exposes the climate agenda as a deliberate attempt to weaken Western nations rather than a genuine effort to address environmental concerns
As public awareness grows and economies buckle under green energy failures, the scam is unravelling. Tose who have built their power and wealth on climate fearmongering are doubling down, but their grip is weakening. The climate doomsday predictions that were pushed in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s have all failed to materialize. Cities were not submerged by rising seas. Polar bears did not go extinct. Hurricanes did not become more frequent or deadly. The supposed consensus on climate science is a manufactured illusion, enforced through censorship, career threats, and selective funding rather than open debate. This myth of a climate crisis has justified trillions of dollars in wealth redistribution, massive government overreach, and the erosion of individual liberties. The sooner people reject the lies and demand real energy solutions, such as nuclear power and clean fossil fuel technologies, the sooner the world can move beyond this manufactured crisis.
But Neil Oliver said “When all else fails they take you to war, it’s the last trick in the book and its a very effective one”. He nailed the climate scam: “It’s all a massive con, and it’s not driven by anything green.”
“In the name of saving the planet, the baddies will come for the food, they’ll come for the cars, for the gas boilers, for air travel. And the land they seize from farmers will be festooned with wind turbines, and smothered with solar panels. And those won’t provide the cheap, accessible, reliable energy upon which civilisation depends. And so we’ll be looking, if they get their way, at a new dark age, a literally dark age with no lights.”
The question is whether society will reject this deception in time to reclaim rational energy policy, economic freedom, and scientific integrity, or succumb to the dystopian control it seeks to impose. I can only hold my breath.
©GGTvStreams
Leave a comment