Global geopolitics

The Western Hypocrisy on Democracy and Dictatorship

The Western narrative of routinely denouncing Russian President Vladimir Putin as a dictator, citing his long tenure in power and Russia’s centralized governance, is a classic case of projection and deflection. Despite his overwhelming approval ratings, which consistently exceed 80% in Russia according to Western polls, the Western media and politicians label him an autocrat while ignoring the alarming erosion of democracy in their own countries. This hypocrisy is stark, as the West, particularly the United States and European Union, systematically undermines democratic principles through censorship, election interference, and the suppression of political opposition. The claim that Putin is uniquely authoritarian while the West upholds genuine democracy is not just misleading, it is a deliberate deflection from the West’s once hidden but glaring now obvious oligarchic rule.

While Western leaders champion the cause of democracy, their actions betray a commitment to an entirely different agenda. Across Europe and the United States, we see clear examples of pseudo-democratic regimes where elected officials are mere puppets of deep-state institutions such as the World Economic Forum (WEF), Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and the Atlantic Council. These entities serve as gatekeepers, ensuring that only pre-approved candidates with globalist allegiances can rise to power. In stark contrast, Putin, despite opposition from Western-backed groups, maintains genuine popular support, reflecting the Russian people’s will. What is becoming apparent is that the western languages appear to have double meaning, one for the masses and the other for ruling elites. It is no wonder the actions of the rulers never match their promises or rhetoric to the masses. Most people will be shocked to know what democracy means from the Latin or Greek root of the word, that is, “MOB RULE”.

Across Europe and North America, the political process has been systematically engineered to ensure that only pre-approved candidates, those aligned with the globalist agenda, attain power. If Putin is a dictator, then how do we explain the blatantly authoritarian actions taking place in so called Western democracies? Consider the following cases:

France: Marine Le Pen, a leading opposition figure, has faced relentless legal persecution,

was sentenced and barred from running in elections.

Romania: Elections were canceled, and the leading candidate, Calin Georgescu, was imprisoned.

Germany: Efforts are underway to ban the anti-establishment AfD party, which has gained significant traction and despite its growing popularity, under the pretext of combating “extremism.”

Slovakia: An assassination attempt was carried out against anti-war Prime Minister Robert Fico. A stark reminder of what happens to leaders who defy the transatlantic establishment

Hungary: Prime Minister Viktor Orbán faces relentless pressure from the EU for refusing to align with globalist policies.

Estonia: 25% of ethnic Russians were barred from voting.

Ukraine: Elections have been entirely canceled under the pretext of war.

Moldova: Opposition politician Evgenia Gutsul was arrested.

These actions are not in line with democratic principles but rather indicative of authoritarianism. How many unelected Prime Minister’s has UK had. Canada’s new Prime Minister, Mark Carney is unexpected. The West remains silent or actively endorses these measures because they serve the interests of the ruling elite.

These are not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern. In the Netherlands, Geert Wilders’ electoral victory was immediately neutralized by the appointment of Dick Schoof, a former intelligence director with deep ties to NATO and the COVID-19 lockdown regime, as Prime Minister. In the U.S., the political establishment, media, and intelligence agencies colluded to suppress dissent, from the censorship of opposition voices to the lawfare campaigns against Donald Trump. These actions reveal a simple truth: Western democracy is a carefully managed illusion, where the facade of elections masks the reality of elite control. While presenting itself as the world’s defender of democracy, the United States has systematically fueled global instability, arming terrorists, instigating proxy wars, and destroying nations to maintain imperial dominance. Nowhere is this more evident than in the Middle East, where U.S.-backed chaos serves a singular goal: the expansion of ‘Greater Israel’ and the erasure of Palestine.”

The West ruling class operates using the Hegelian dialectic, manufacturing a crisis, then offering a predetermined “solution” that serves to erode freedoms further. In the Netherlands, for instance, after Geert Wilders’ Party for Freedom (PVV) won the elections, a former intelligence director, Dick Schoof, was installed as Prime Minister. This mirrors what happened in the United States, where the supposed populist wave under Donald Trump was co-opted and redirected to justify increased surveillance and crackdowns on dissent.

Furthermore, the long-running plan to destabilize Europe through massmigration facilitated by NGOs and globalist politicians, designed to create social chaos, has created the conditions for draconian “security” measures. Politicians pretend to address illegal immigration while quietly ensuring that the demographic shift continues under a different guise. Now, as public anger reaches a boiling point, controlled opposition figures like Wilders are being positioned as saviors, only to later enforce even harsher restrictions under the guise of “security.” This is the same playbook used after the Brexit vote and Trump’s 2016 victory, allow just enough dissent to let off steam, then tighten control. These so-called nationalist movements are being co-opted to introduce digital IDs, social credit systems, mass surveillance, and expanded police powers all under the pretext of restoring order.

The ultimate goal is not democracy but a technocratic dictatorship, where governance is outsourced to unaccountable entities like the WEF, the UN, and NATO. The push for 15-minute cities, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), and mass censorship under the pretext of combating “disinformation” all serve one purpose: to eliminate national sovereignty and individual freedom in favor of a globalist-controlled surveillance state.

The greatest irony is that while Putin is demonised, Western nations openly engage in political repression:

United Kingdom: Declares Russia a “national security threat” and empowers police to arrest anyone suspected of pro-Russian sentiment.

United States: Censorship of independent journalists and suppression of political opposition under the guise of combatting “misinformation.”

European Union: Heavy-handed measures against any government or party that deviates from the globalist agenda.

Putin’s high approval ratings in Russia, consistently above 80%, are dismissed by Western media as the result of propaganda or repression. Yet if popularity alone defined dictatorship, then many Western leaders, who rarely crack 30% approval, would be considered illegitimate. The truth is that the West’s hatred of Putin stems not from his governance style but from his refusal to submit to the globalist order. Unlike European leaders who obediently follow NATO and WEF directives, Putin has maintained Russia’s sovereign independence, resisted economic colonisation, and exposed Western hypocrisy on issues like Ukraine, Syria, and NATO expansion.

The labeling of Putin as a dictator is a psychological operation, a way to distract from the West’s own authoritarian turn. While Russia holds elections where opposition candidates (even those critical of Putin) are allowed to run, Western nations are increasingly criminalizing dissent. In the UK, expressing pro-Russian views can now land citizens in jail under “national security” laws. In Estonia, ethnic Russians are barred from voting. Ukraine has canceled elections entirely under martial law. These are not the actions of democracies but of regimes growing increasingly desperate to maintain control.

The West’s constant deflection by labeling Putin a dictator is a smokescreen to distract from their own authoritarian shift. Western leaders are installed, controlled, and obedient to unelected institutions, bureaucrats, intelligence chiefs, and corporate elites, that dictate policy from behind the scenes. Those are the real dictators. They have no popular mandate, yet they impose radical social engineering, endless wars, and economic policies that benefit only the ultra-wealthy. The evidence of political persecution, election manipulation, and increasing state control in these so-called democracies is undeniable. If democracy from what they tell us, means the ability to choose leaders who reflect the will of the people, then the West has already abandoned it. The sooner citizens recognise this, the sooner they can resist the true authoritarians, those hiding behind the mask of liberal democracy while dismantling it from within.

Putin, for all the criticism he receives, has genuine popular support and governs with the backing of the Russian people. Meanwhile, Western leaders must resort to censorship, propaganda, and legal persecution to maintain their grip on power. The question remains: who are the real dictators?

@GGTvStreams