A Hostile Takeover from Within
It’s quite clear now the America is infact not a country as definede but a corporation of some sort. In an explosive interview with Tucker Carlson, former Anheuser-Busch President Anson Frericks revealed the truth behind the ideological shift sweeping through American corporations. Far from being an organic reaction to public events, this transformation was orchestrated by the three largest asset managers, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street, who used their outsized financial power to force corporate America into ideological compliance, adopting specific social and political agendas. With trillions of dollars under management, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard collectively hold dominant voting power in nearly every major U.S. corporation.
Frericks, speaking from firsthand experience, explained how corporate executives were strong-armed into adopting socio-political agendas not because of consumer demand, but under pressure from their dominant shareholders. “George Floyd dies, and now all of a sudden the next existential crisis that every single company in the United States is looking to solve is ‘systemic racism,’” Frericks recalled. This pivot wasn’t spontaneous, it was part of a broader engineered campaign. “Their largest so-called shareholders, BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard, told them, ‘We need you solving societal issues now.’”
As a result, more than 70 major U.S. companies donated over $200 billion to Black Lives Matter-related causes, an amount greater than the GDP of Portugal. “You had 70 companies donate over $200 billion to Black Lives Matter, that’s more than the GDP of Portugal,” Frericks emphasized. Yet the donations were just the beginning. When Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg offered financial support, even that wasn’t enough. “Even Zuckerberg at Facebook donated some eight-figure sum. But then that summer, Trump had the famous tweet about ‘When the looting starts, the shooting starts.’ Then everyone wanted him to take Trump off of Facebook.” The social media giants like Facebook faced pressure not only to promote certain narratives but to silence dissenting voices, including then, President Donald Trump. Frericks notes that this wasn’t about societal healing, but about enforcing ideological conformity through economic leverage. He underlined the coercive nature of this movement. “Because it just wasn’t enough to donate. You actually had to silence folks as well.” The message was clear: compliance wasn’t optional, it was mandatory, and dissent would not be tolerated.
I would probably say one of the most glaring examples of how ESG and DEI mandates exposed this power was the Bud Light fiasco. This involved a transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Anheuser-Busch, under pressure from asset managers like BlackRock and Vanguard, embraced progressive identity politics in its marketing by sponsoring Mulvaney. The result? A monumental backlash from its core consumers that led to Bud Light losing its title as America’s top-selling beer. These marketing decisions were not organic but “engineered” by those dominant shareholders pushing a social agenda. The fallout from the Dylan Mulvaney campaign is a cautionary tale of what happens when corporations abandon market realities in favor of ideology dictated from above.
The influence of BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard runs deep. These asset managers own controlling stakes in virtually every major U.S. company and wield disproportionate influence through shareholder voting mechanisms. “They have disproportionate power to advocate for policies,” Frericks explained. “And most importantly, to vote on shareholder proposals, where if you own $25,000 in any company, you can put up a proposal all shareholders vote on.” This has enabled activist shareholders to weaponise corporate governance, pushing ideological proposals through companies that have little to no resistance due to boardroom capture.
This new form of governance bypasses democracy entirely. Shareholder resolutions, once intended to improve company performance, are now used as ideological weapons. Activists backed by large financial institutions submit resolutions to push climate policy, racial equity mandates, and LGBTQ+ promotional efforts across corporate America. Frericks reveals that even companies like Apple are not immune, as their governance is increasingly dictated not by customers or workers, but by the political preferences of a handful of asset managers.
This is not just a shift in corporate culture, it is a hostile takeover by financial institutions deeply embedded in globalist structures like the World Economic Forum (WEF). Through instruments such as DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) metrics, these institutions are enforcing a global ideological realignment. These policies tie directly into larger globalist frameworks such as Agenda 2021 and Agenda 2030, which promote centralised control, digital monitoring, and the erosion of national sovereignty.
Beyond social engineering through DEI and ESG frameworks, the same financial powerhouses, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street, have played pivotal roles in advancing the weaponization of global crises. Through their alignment with the World Economic Forum and Agenda 2030, these entities have backed policies that treat climate change as a tool for control, not stewardship. “Net zero” targets and carbon credit systems are being used to restrict energy use and enforce compliance through digital surveillance, while the reality of large-scale geoengineering efforts remains largely unaccountable to the public. During the COVID-19 pandemic, these asset managers were among the largest shareholders in pharmaceutical giants pushing experimental vaccines, often lobbying governments into mass purchasing agreements with little to no liability. Food systems, too, are under siege, as their investments extend into synthetic meat, monoculture agriculture, and the buying up of farmland, moves that centralize food control under corporate hands. As global wars erupt, including in Ukraine and the Middle East, these same financial interests profit from defense contracts and reconstruction plans, turning human suffering into economic opportunity. It’s not about solving crises, it’s about creating dependency, fueling chaos, and offering top-down “solutions” that ultimately consolidate control.
In essence, what we are witnessing is not a cultural revolution but a corporate coup. The traditional balance of power in a democratic capitalist society, where consumers, voters, and individual investors hold sway, is being upended by centralised economic entities pushing a globalist agenda. Frericks’ warning is clear: America’s cultural, economic, and political systems are being hijacked in real time, and without transparency or public consent.
The endgame is increasingly clear: the establishment of a one-world government, one universal digital identity system, and a global surveillance regime. The tools are already being deployed, Digital ID, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), AI censorship algorithms, and climate-based social credit systems. These systems are not about equity or sustainability, they are about control. The corporate sector, hijacked by financial powerhouses, is the enforcement arm of this digital prison.
The future of freedom may well depend on recognizing this shift and resisting the consolidation of power into the hands of a few unelected and unaccountable financial giants. What began as corporate activism has evolved into a mechanism of control, one that could permanently reshape the fabric of society if left unchecked.
@GGTvStreams
Leave a comment