Why Our Trust in “SCIENCE” Maybe Killing Us
For decades, we’ve been told to “trust the science,” to believe in the integrity of our healthcare systems, our regulatory agencies, our doctors, and the miracle of modern medicine. But the truth, slowly and painfully unraveling, is far darker than the public has been led to believe. The latest revelations, brought to light in Joe Rogan’s interview with renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra, expose a rot so systemic that it shakes the foundation of medicine itself.
Before I proceed further let me highlight the doctors’ betrayal of their oath. At the heart of this “system” are doctors, once seen as the last line of defense for patient safety. But under industry influence, many have abandoned their sacred oath to “first, do no harm.” Instead of champions of healing, too many have become agents of pharmaceutical protocol. Most importantly, informed consent, a bedrock of medical ethics, has been eroded. We experienced with covid mRNA vaccines, doctors injected billions of people without hesitation. Patients are rarely told the full scope of risks, the data behind the drugs, or the fact that trial results may have been manipulated. Most are handed a prescription, not a choice.
We are brainwashed night and day to believe in the “system”. That the FDA and CDC keeps us safe. That medical schools create ethical doctors. That journals are truth-tellers. That the media keeps us informed. That politicians protect the public. But when you follow the money, the lies, and the outcomes, it becomes terrifyingly clear: the entire medical-industrial complex is compromised from top to bottom.
Whether by willful ignorance or systemic pressure, the medical profession has allowed itself to be used. And patients are paying the price, with their health, their trust, and sometimes, their lives.
What Dr. Malhotra revealed about statin drug trials should enrage every person who has ever swallowed a prescription believing it was safe and effective. In major studies, like the Heart Protection Study, over 36,000 patients were removed before the actual trial began because they experienced side effects. They were labeled “non-compliant,” not because they refused the treatment, but because the drug harmed them. And once they were removed, the clinical trial went on to report only the results from those who could tolerate the drug, artificially minimizing risk and inflating safety. This practice, known as the “pre-randomization run-in period,” is legal. Worse, it is standard.
Let that sink in: the pharmaceutical industry legally erases the harmed from the evidence base. These manipulated trials are then used to gain FDA approval, shape medical guidelines, and fuel massive marketing campaigns. Doctors prescribe these drugs in good faith, patients take them in blind trust—and all the while, the truth is buried under a mountain of regulatory sleight-of-hand. But this corruption runs far deeper than a few dishonest trials. It infects the entire chain, from the funding of medical schools to the nightly news.
Medical training is funded and influenced by pharmaceutical companies. Pfizer, Merck, and others fund medical education directly through grants and sponsored training programs. This often influences what doctors learn, or more importantly, what they don’t. Doctors are trained more like pharmaceutical reps than independent thinkers. They learn treatment algorithms crafted by industry-funded panels, using data from trials funded by the very companies selling the pills. Doctors aren’t being taught to heal, they’re being taught to prescribe, not question. In 2008, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) admitted that 94% of U.S. medical students are exposed to pharma marketing before they graduate. Free lunches, drug samples, and biased curricula, often funded by Pfizer, Merck, and friends, shape what doctors believe from day one. Want proof? Just look at statin guidelines (like those recommending statins for nearly everyone over 40). They’re written by panels where nearly every “expert” has financial ties to drug manufacturers. Doctors follow these protocols not because they’re the best, but because they’re bought and paid for.
Scientific journals, once the gold standard of objective truth, are now heavily dependent on pharmaceutical advertising and study sponsorships. Whistleblowers and inconvenient truths are buried, while ghostwritten papers from drug companies get front-page placement in prestigious journals. What you read in medical journals may not be science, it’s marketing dressed in a lab coat. In the Vioxx scandal, Merck hired ghostwriters to produce scientific articles that downplayed risks of its painkiller Vioxx, which later caused up to 60,000 deaths before being pulled. These papers were published in reputable journals. The Lancet and NEJM, two of the most respected journals, have both had editors publicly admit the industry has corrupted the system. Dr. Marcia Angell (former NEJM editor) famously said:
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published.”
Industry-funded studies are 400% more likely to yield favorable outcomes compared to independent studies.
Regulatory bodies like the FDA are no longer watchdogs, they’re business partners. The FDA receives 75% of its drug review budget/funding directly from the companies it is supposed to regulate through “user fees.” Conflicts of interest abound, and approvals are rushed under the guise of urgency while long-term harms are ignored or downplayed. Purdue Pharma’s OxyContin was approved despite weak evidence and misleading claims that it was less addictive. FDA official Curtis Wright, who oversaw the approval, later took a job at Purdue. So the people approving your medications are often hoping for job offers from the same companies. The FDA approved Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm in 2021 despite a lack of convincing evidence. Its own advisory committee voted 10-0 against the approval, yet the FDA pushed it through. Three committee members resigned in protest.
Mainstream media apart from running an unprecedented censorship apparatus, parrots whatever press releases come from Big Pharma, often without question. Why? Because the pharmaceutical industry is among the largest advertisers on television and digital platforms. Stories that threaten their profits often simply don’t get told. The media is no longer your watchdog, it’s Big Pharma’s PR wing. Pharma is the number 1 advertiser on U.S. television, especially on news networks like CNN, Fox, and MSNBC. This buys narrative control. Dr. Peter McCullough ( very important independent medical expert, get to know his work) and Dr. Aseem Malhotra, both credentialed cardiologists, were blacklisted or censored on mainstream outlets for raising questions about COVID vaccines and statins, even as their concerns were backed by data. In 2020, major outlets like Facebook and YouTube removed scientific discussions from qualified experts, citing “misinformation”, while allowing uncritical pharma marketing to flood users.
Politicians, whose campaigns depend on lobbying dollars, are silent—or complicit. Legislation is written to protect patents, shield companies from liability, and enable monopolies that bankrupt patients and healthcare systems alike.
And the end result? A public robbed of its health, its money, and its trust. The Pharmaceutical industry lobbying hit a record $356 million in 2022, dwarfing other industries. That’s over $650,000 per U.S. congressperson. Former Congressman Billy Tauzin, who helped pass the Medicare Part D bill (which prohibited the government from negotiating drug prices), retired and became CEO of PhRMA, the pharmaceutical lobby, earning over $2 million a year. Politicians across both parties receive campaign donations and “consulting” perks from pharma. In return, we get legislation that blocks generic drugs, extends patent monopolies, and shifts liability away from corporations. The same politicians who tell you to trust the science are often bought by the very companies that corrupt it. This isn’t public service. It’s organised betrayal.
When people raise concerns about vaccine side effects, antidepressant dependency, or statin risks, they are ridiculed as conspiracy theorists. But this isn’t theory. It’s documented, institutionalized fraud disguised as science. The corruption is not just in the pills, but in the pipeline, from lab bench to doctor’s pen. It is time to stop blindly trusting “the science” and start demanding transparency, accountability, and true scientific integrity. Your life, your family’s life, depends on it.
So, Who’s Looking Out for You?
Not the scientists.
Not the doctors.
Not the journals.
Not the FDA.
Not the media.
Not the politicians.
You’re on your own.
This is why trust must be earned, not demanded. “Trust the science” has become a cult-like slogan, designed to shut down questions and protect profits. Real science thrives on doubt, debate, and transparency. But what we have now is a pharmaceutical empire masquerading as public health.
The system isn’t broken. It’s built this way. It’s time to stop blindly trusting and start relentlessly questioning. Your life, and your children’s, depends on it.
On that note, remember to stay away from vaccines !
@GGTvStreams
Leave a comment