The climate crisis is not primarily about saving the Earth
For years, we’ve been told that climate change is the greatest existential threat facing humanity. That the science is settled. That we must radically transform our economies, restrict our freedoms, and place unprecedented trust in global institutions to “save the planet.” But beneath the apocalyptic headlines and dramatic soundbites lies a troubling truth: the climate crisis is not primarily about saving the Earth. It’s about controlling the people who live on it.
The idea that forests are “losing their ability to absorb carbon dioxide,” as recently repeated by broadcaster Fiona Bruce, is a perfect example. It’s a scientifically ridiculous claim with no cited sources and no challenge in the media. Trees, like all green plants, rely on carbon dioxide as their primary fuel. More CO₂ in the atmosphere means more photosynthesis, greater growth, and more carbon sequestration. This is basic biology, not ideology.
So why spread such a claim? Because it fits the narrative. The climate agenda has evolved from genuine environmental concern into a tool for advancing centralized authority, permanent emergency measures, and social reengineering. It’s not about reducing emissions; it’s about manufacturing consent through fear. The public is being softened up for radical interventions, geoengineering, global taxation, land grabs, and digital monitoring, all under the guise of climate safety.
Take geoengineering. For years, it was dismissed as a fringe conspiracy. Now, it’s openly discussed by governments and research institutions as a “necessary solution” to global warming. Techniques like stratospheric aerosol injection, spraying reflective particles into the atmosphere to block sunlight, are being tested or proposed without any public debate, long-term safety studies, or democratic input. The irony? The very thing we are told is causing global warming, human interference with nature, is now being prescribed as the solution. And if it backfires, they’ll blame the weather, not the geoengineering.
Meanwhile, weather modification programs like HAARP, cloud seeding, and chemical aerosol spraying (commonly referred to as chemtrails) continue without public scrutiny. Soil tests in affected regions often show elevated levels of aluminum, barium, and strontium, elements not naturally found in such concentrations. These contaminants damage plant life, disrupt soil biology, and weaken trees’ ability to thrive. If anything is “reducing carbon absorption,” it’s this poisoning of the Earth, not a spontaneous loss of function by the forest.
But instead of acknowledging the harm done by decades of pollution, land exploitation, and covert weather manipulation, globalist institutions pivot to carbon credits and social controls. Farmers are told to cull livestock. Industries are pressured to shut down. Individuals are urged to eat bugs, accept rationing, and live in 15-minute cities, all while multinational corporations continue to pollute, deforest, and profit.
And now, we’re being told the sun itself must be blocked to protect us. That’s not science, it’s hubris. Who gave unelected technocrats the right to tamper with the planetary thermostat? Who benefits if they succeed in dimming the sun? Not the farmers. Not the ecosystems. And certainly not the people who already struggle with food insecurity and energy costs. Once again, a manmade crisis becomes the pretext for greater control.
Let’s be clear: the climate is being manipulated, but not by carbon dioxide. It’s being manipulated by powerful interests who see fear as the fastest route to obedience. They are not preserving nature; they are rewriting the rules of civilization under the false flag of environmentalism.
Trees aren’t the problem. Carbon isn’t the enemy. The real threat is the weaponisation of science to serve a political and economic agenda. A future of geoengineered skies, sterilised soil, and restricted freedom is not progress, it’s a prison built on lies.
Do you remember the formula for photosynthesis?:
6 CO2 + 6 H2O = C6 H12 O6 + 6 O2
The hysteria surrounding climate change often leads to the demonisation of CO2, yet it’s important to recognize that carbon dioxide is a vital component of the Earth’s ecosystem. In the process of photosynthesis, plants require CO2, along with water (H2O), to produce glucose (C6H12O6) and release oxygen (O2). If the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is reduced too much, this fundamental process would be hindered, leading to less plant growth and a decrease in oxygen production, both of which are essential for life on Earth. While excessive CO2 can contribute to global warming, it’s crucial to maintain a balanced perspective, understanding that CO2 also plays an indispensable role in sustaining life on the planet.
By now most people should be aware of chemtrails, the purposeful spraying our planet with aluminum sulfate from the airplanes to block the sun’s rays from reaching earth. This has the effect of saturating the soil with aluminum and inhibiting plant growth. This is being done intentionally to create an illusion of global climate change so we all believe the climate crisis scam while they slowly suffocate us.
If we truly cared about the planet, we’d be protecting forests, not reengineering the weather. We’d be restoring the soil, not poisoning it from above. And we’d be demanding transparency, not surrendering sovereignty to global think tanks and unelected panels.
The Earth doesn’t need saving from carbon. It needs saving from those who want to rule it through fear.
@GGTvStreams
Leave a comment