The problem for Africa is the dependency induced copy & paste culture
Nothing is happening in Africa despite overwhelming evidence that Covid was a manufactured pandemic for a nefarious and evil depopulation agenda. Not only did this worst crime against humanity in history decimated health systems in Africa, most economies have not recovered from the carnage. African medical experts often avoid open discussions about vaccine-related injuries or the possible engineered origins of pandemics like COVID-19 or HIV/AIDS due to a combination of institutional dependency, political pressure, and fear of professional consequences. Many African health institutions rely heavily on funding, guidance, and approval from international bodies such as the WHO, CDC, and donor organisations, which often promote unified narratives and discourage dissent. Challenging these narratives risks funding cuts, reputational damage, or loss of career opportunities.
Additionally, the legacy of colonialism in global health has created a top-down structure where African scientists are expected to follow Western consensus rather than lead independent inquiries. As a result, even when evidence or suspicion exists, critical discussion is stifled by a culture of deference and caution, mirroring the silence that surrounded the unresolved questions about the origins and spread of HIV/AIDS decades ago. I have no qualms about advocating for the total ban of vaccines on the African continent. I have seen the evidence, there is absolutely zero benefit to humans from these biological weapons. These poisons are nothing but a funeral business model, profits and deaths.
Dr. Jessica Rose’s testimony from the video above raises serious concerns about the safety monitoring and public transparency surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines. Her presentation is rooted in pharmacovigilance analysis, specifically using the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database, and applies established epidemiological tools to question why strong safety signals related to the COVID-19 vaccines were not acted upon in the way previous signals have been.
VAERS has historically served as a tool to monitor vaccine safety by identifying early warning signs of possible adverse events. While it is a passive surveillance system, it has been used successfully in the past to detect issues with pharmaceutical products. Dr. Rose highlights the example of the 1999 withdrawal of a rotavirus vaccine after 584 cases of intussusception were reported. By comparison, she notes that by January 20, 2021, there were already 634 death reports related to the COVID-19 vaccines. According to her analysis, this number exceeded what had previously been considered sufficient to halt or at least review a vaccination campaign.
She argues that this difference in treatment is not scientific but political. The tools used to determine causality in pharmacovigilance, such as the Bradford Hill criteria and Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), indicate that these vaccine products should have raised alarm bells. For example, she states that the PRR for death in the context of COVID-19 vaccines is 3.6, which, by established standards, is a significant signal that warrants thorough investigation.
One of the most striking points in her testimony is the sheer number of adverse event reports: over 1.6 million to VAERS related to COVID-19 vaccines, with over one million of those filed in 2021 alone. In contrast, the average for all vaccines combined in prior years was just under 40,000 annually. This represents a 1,417% increase, a spike that cannot be explained by increased vaccine administration alone, according to Rose. She presents data comparing adverse events per million doses of influenza vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines, showing a 26-fold and 100-fold increase in total events and deaths respectively for the COVID-19 products.
She further debunks the claim that these reports are due to older or at-risk populations. In fact, she says, the data show that the rate of adverse event reporting in children aged 0–4 increased more rapidly than in any other group. Moreover, myocarditis, a type of heart inflammation, shows a clear pattern: young males, especially those receiving the second dose, are disproportionately affected. She cites a fourfold increase in myocarditis cases among 15-year-old boys after the second shot. This satisfies several Bradford Hill criteria, including specificity, dose-response, and reversibility. When the vaccines are paused or demand decreases, the number of reported myocarditis cases also drops.
Dr. Rose concludes that the CDC, FDA, and HHS have failed to follow their own established procedures for handling pharmacovigilance data. She argues that not only are adverse events being ignored, but entire categories of injuries are being effectively hidden by those who control access to and interpretation of the data. Her conclusion is not that vaccines have no place in public health, but that the particular approach taken with the COVID-19 vaccines broke long-standing safety standards in favor of political expediency and pharmaceutical profit.
This raises important questions about regulatory integrity. If prior safety thresholds were disregarded for COVID-19 vaccines, then it is fair to ask whether political or corporate influence played a role. Public trust in health institutions hinges on transparency and accountability. When known tools and standards are not applied consistently, the result is not only potential harm to individuals but long-term damage to confidence in public health systems.
The core message of Dr. Rose’s testimony is clear: the COVID-19 vaccine campaign marked a departure from historical norms in safety monitoring. The data she presents, if accurate and reproducible, demand investigation. Ignoring such signals risks undermining the very foundation of public health oversight.
Based on the above testimony, Africans must have the courage to begin vaccine conversations. Until African medical experts break free from external control and speak boldly based on evidence, millions will remain vulnerable to policies shaped by politics, not truth. Silence in the face of clear danger is not neutrality, it is complicity.
@GGTvStreams video credit: https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1921907376577282259?s=19
Leave a comment