Covid was deliberate and coordinated psychological campaign
Dr. Robert Malone’s statements about the COVID-19 pandemic paint a picture that challenges much of the accepted narrative. He argues that what took place during the pandemic was not just a public health response, but a deliberate and coordinated psychological campaign carried out by Western governments and major private institutions. He claims this was the largest propaganda effort in modern Western history, involving cooperation between governments, corporations, media, and international bodies. These are not light accusations. They force a serious examination of the methods and motives behind how the pandemic was managed.
According to Malone, the strategies used were not typical public messaging. He says they were military-grade psychological operations, tools normally reserved for war zones, used on Western citizens. If true, this marks a major shift in how governments interact with their populations. Psychological operations, or psy-ops, are designed to shape beliefs and control behavior. When used in warfare, they aim to weaken the enemy’s will. Applying those tools to civilian populations in a peacetime setting raises deep ethical and legal questions.
What stands out in his statements is the claim that public-private partnerships were central to this effort. In other words, the pandemic response wasn’t just government policy. It involved pharmaceutical companies, media outlets, non-governmental organizations, and financial institutions all working together. Some of this is confirmed by public records. Governments did rely heavily on private companies for vaccine production, distribution, and information campaigns. News networks and social media companies also played key roles in regulating what information was promoted or censored. The problem is that this overlap of power limits public accountability. When government and corporate interests merge, it becomes hard to know who is really in charge, and who is benefiting.
Malone’s statements also speak to the emotional and psychological cost of the pandemic response. Beyond lockdowns, mandates, and economic disruption, many citizens were exposed to constant fear messaging. The idea was to keep people compliant and unified behind public health measures. But for a large part of the population, the result was not trust, it was division, confusion, and a growing sense of isolation. Once trust in institutions is lost, it is difficult to rebuild.
His final comment, that the world we thought we lived in may never have existed, reflects a loss of faith in democratic systems. If governments are willing to turn military information tools on their own people, then the idea of open, transparent governance comes into question. Citizens may start to believe they are not participants in a democracy, but subjects of control.
These claims are not about whether COVID-19 was real, or whether it required a response. The real issue is how that response was executed, who shaped the narrative, and whether the tools used respected the rights and intelligence of the population. Whether one agrees with Malone or not, ignoring these questions risks repeating the same patterns in future crises.
If there is to be any lesson from the pandemic, it must begin with admitting the scale and scope of what happened, not only in terms of disease, but in how society was governed under pressure. If democratic nations used tools of coercion and propaganda on their own people, that is not just a health issue. It is a political one, and it demands answers.
@GGTvStreams
If you think my voice should be heard louder then PLEASE support by becoming a paid subscriber. I have minimal overheads, no sponsors to sell myself or soul to, no bosses who tell me what to write (or NOT write), or staff I have to pay. I’m here for your raw, straight, and dedicated analyses. Your support is appreciated. Thank you.
buymeacoffee.com/ggtv
Leave a comment