The African Population Has Been A Target of Unethical Medical Experiments
Medical care in Africa has become less about healing and more about control, a depopulation business model cloaked in the language of aid and science. The system is deeply parasitic and riddled with corruption, mirroring the same political hierarchies that dominate governance. Just as one cannot freely question a politician without fear of reprisal, the same holds true for medical professionals. In many African societies, the culture is strictly hierarchical, authority is rarely questioned, and opinions are only respected if they come from someone with credentials. This blind faith in experts creates a dangerous vacuum where corruption thrives without challenge. When experts are compromised, there is no space for debate. “Are you a doctor?” is a question rarely asked out of genuine interest; it is often used to silence dissent, to dismiss uncomfortable truths, and to shut down critical discussion. It reflects a mindset that values status over substance. But truth does not require a title. Facts remain facts regardless of who speaks them. Science must not become a religion, and doctors are not infallible, they are not Gods. Knowledge and intellect is not the preserve of titles. If the medical professionals are quiet about the medical genocide on the continent, who is there to speak for the millions suffering and dying? In these times, we must take personal responsibility for having the knowledge, the facts and evidence, not authority.
As this juncture, Africa stands at dangerous crossroads. For decades, its populations have been targets, sometimes knowingly, sometimes unknowingly, of unethical medical experimentation, failed vaccine programs, and systems that place profit above human life. As we navigate this age of information and misinformation, it’s important for Africans to step back and re-examine the foundations of modern science and medicine that many of us have blindly trusted. That includes the deeply controversial practice known as “gain-of-function” research (GOF).
GOF involves deliberately altering viruses to make them more transmissible or deadly, often with the claimed intent of studying how to fight them. But history tells us that the line between scientific curiosity and biological warfare has long been blurred. As RFK Jr. recently emphasised, major intelligence agencies including the CIA, FBI, and Department of Energy have concluded that COVID-19 likely originated from such experiments funded by the NIH.
These weren’t the actions of rogue labs in far-off lands. These were elite institutions operating in broad daylight with full government cooperation. Investigative leaks, whistleblower testimony, and internal government documents have now linked pre-pandemic coronavirus engineering not only to foreign labs but to U.S. domestic institutions. Research at facilities like the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, under Dr. Ralph Baric, involved the development of chimeric coronaviruses years before the Wuhan outbreak. These were GOF experiments, explicitly manipulating viral genomes to make them more infectious to humans. These experiments were funded by the NIH and NIAID under Dr. Anthony Fauci’s oversight, with EcoHealth Alliance acting as a financial and logistical conduit.
What’s more, leaked DARPA proposals from 2018, particularly the now-infamous “DEFUSE” project, outline plans to insert a furin cleavage site into bat coronaviruses, exactly the feature that made SARS-CoV-2 uniquely infectious to human cells. DARPA itself rejected the proposal due to biosafety concerns, but the work appears to have gone forward anyway, potentially outside regulatory oversight.
Then there’s USAID, traditionally seen as a humanitarian agency, but with deep ties to intelligence operations. USAID has been implicated in funding biological research and surveillance programs globally, including through PREDICT and other pandemic forecasting initiatives. These were designed, ostensibly, to prevent pandemics, but they also created an infrastructure for collecting and manipulating viruses globally, under U.S. strategic control.
And now we must speak frankly about the biolabs in Ukraine. There is more to that war in Ukraine than the narratives we are fed. For years, the Pentagon’s Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) operated a network of biological labs across Ukraine under the Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program. Initially pitched as a way to prevent proliferation of Soviet-era biological weapons, these labs expanded into areas of high-level pathogen research. Russian accusations of bioweapons development in these labs, once dismissed as propaganda, are now being taken more seriously, especially in light of admitted U.S. oversight of more than 25 such facilities. The secrecy, the dual-use potential, and the location near a geopolitical flashpoint all raise serious red flags. Russia’s Deputy Chief of the NBC Protection Troops Alexey Rtishchev ( see headline video) said at a briefing in December 2024 that the US was transferring unfinished military-biological projects to Africa. He said, the Americans view this continent as a testing ground for full-scale testing of experimental medicine. US scientists in 18 African countries are studying the resistance of pathogens to drugs, with funding coming through Pentagon-linked fundsD Diseases that the Pentagon is interested in become pandemics, and American pharmaceutical companies become beneficiaries.
So when we follow the trail, of funding, planning, and scientific development, it increasingly points not to a Chinese bio-leak in isolation, but to a coordinated, international system led and managed by U.S. agencies. Wuhan may have been the ignition point, if at all, but the fuel and the spark originated far closer to Washington than Beijing.
The playbook isn’t new. In fact, it began over a century ago. In 1916, a Rockefeller lab in Manhattan conducted polio experiments with a stated goal: to create the most neurologically damaging strain of the virus possible. By injecting monkey brains with human spinal fluid, they created a virus that accidentally, or perhaps “accidentally”, escaped into the public. The result? The worst polio epidemic ever recorded, with a staggering 25% mortality rate. This was not nature. This was man-made catastrophe.
Fast forward to the modern era, and the same hands are still at work. In India, 47,000 children were paralyzed by a polio vaccine program linked to the Gates Foundation. India took them to court. Similar stories emerged in Africa and Southeast Asia, where vaccine trials, often without proper consent or regulation, resulted in mass harm. This is not public health. This is a system treating human beings as test subjects.
Yet the problem goes deeper than just vaccines or labs. It lies in the structure of global medicine itself. Western medical institutions are controlled by a powerful elite that prioritizes business over healing. The Rockefeller Foundation restructured modern medicine in the early 20th century to align it with their business interests, making pharmaceutical drugs the primary focus of treatment while marginalising natural or holistic approaches. From education to policy-making, everything is guided by profit, not health.
Doctors are trained in this system to follow orders, memorise protocols, copy, paste and never ask hard questions. They trust the science, not because they understand it, but because it comes with institutional approval. In Africa, this blind trust in credentials has fueled a boom in fake doctorate degrees and unqualified professionals, especially in countries like Zimbabwe. But the bigger problem is that Africans are conditioned to believe that anything from the West is automatically better, smarter, or more trustworthy.
This indoctrination, combined with a lack of understanding of tactics like the Hegelian dialectic, leaves us vulnerable. We are constantly manipulated: a problem is created, public fear follows, and the same forces that caused the crisis offer the “solution,” usually in the form of a profitable vaccine or policy. It’s not conspiracy; it’s strategy.
When it comes to vaccines, we are told they are “safe and effective.” But what are the facts? None of the 72 vaccines on the U.S. childhood schedule have ever been tested in double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trials, the gold standard of medical research. In a landmark 2018 lawsuit, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. forced the CDC to admit this. If you tested a new drug without a placebo group, it would be banned. But when it comes to vaccines, different rules apply. Why?
Because vaccines are protected. Legally, they cannot be sued for injury or death in most jurisdictions. Yet post-vaccination injuries are more common than the diseases they are meant to prevent. The VAERS system in the United States documents thousands of deaths and disabilities after routine immunisations, but most are dismissed or ignored. The figures are even worse in Africa, and there is no debate or discussion about this. There is irrefutable evidence that autism is caused by vaccinations. The human cost and suffering is staggering. Families of autistic individuals face deep emotional and financial strain. Stigma and lack of support isolate them and disrupt daily life. But the medical professionals keep pumping these vaccines into millions of children, what happened to “ do no harm” ?.
(credit: Al-Jazeera)
All of this suffering and death connects to a handful of powerful investment firms, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. These entities own major stakes in pharmaceutical companies, media outlets, insurance companies, food conglomerates, and even funeral services. It’s a closed loop: they create disease, sell the cure, profit from the side effects, and bury the dead. It’s not healthcare. It’s a business model built on endless cycles of illness.
The case of Monsanto and Bayer illustrates the perverse incentives built into the global health and chemical industries. Monsanto’s flagship herbicide, Roundup, containing glyphosate, has been legally linked to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. In a disturbing twist, Bayer, which acquired Monsanto in 2018, is also a leading manufacturer of treatments for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. This means the same corporation profits from both causing the disease and treating it. It is a business model that does not prioritise prevention or public well-being but thrives on cycles of harm and dependency. For Africa, where regulatory oversight is weak and foreign agrochemicals are widely used, this poses a serious ethical and public health crisis. The same entities that supply our seeds and sprays are also positioned to sell us chemotherapy. This is not health, it is profit built on pain.
Since 1970, over 3,000 new chronic diseases have emerged, autism, autoimmune disorders, obesity, diabetes, cancers, all exploding in rates. We are told it’s just bad luck or genetics. But the truth is that modern life, shaped by these interests, is making us sick. Our food is poisoned with chemicals, our air polluted with toxins, and our bodies overloaded with injections from birth.
There was hardly any autism in Vietnam until Bill Gates introduced childhood vaccination there in 2001. In Africa, Before the introduction of Bill Gates–funded DTP (Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis) vaccines in parts of Africa that have killed millions of children, studies showed that vaccinated children had higher mortality rates than unvaccinated ones, especially among girls. There is clear but ignored evidence that shows that unvaccinated children are consistently healthier than their vaccinated peers across multiple health metrics. Independent studies, many suppressed or ignored by mainstream medical bodies, have shown that unvaccinated children suffer far fewer chronic illnesses such as asthma, allergies, autism, autoimmune disorders, and learning disabilities.
These findings have been reinforced by comparisons within the Amish community and in lawsuits like RFK Jr.’s case against the CDC, which revealed no safety testing was ever done using double-blind, placebo-controlled trials on the full childhood vaccine schedule. At the same time, Africa, especially nations like Zimbabwe, has yet to demand accountability for HIV, a virus now well documented as man-made through GOF research. Despite decades of devastation, Africans have neither received answers nor reparations for the engineered AIDS epidemic that tore through the continent. Now, with USAID’s recent withdrawal, Zimbabwe’s already fragile healthcare system has completely collapsed, revealing the dangerous dependence on foreign aid structures built on exploitation, not empowerment.
Most concerning is that Africa is on the brink of an artificial intelligence boom, but with it comes a hidden danger: the uncritical trust in AI systems by users who lack “foundational knowledge” in science, history, and geopolitical power structures. This comes at a time when more Africans are waking up to the insidious imperialist capture of their leaders and elites. As AI tools become more accessible, many Africans are turning to them for information on health, medicine, and global affairs, without realizing that these systems are trained on tightly controlled datasets curated by the same institutions that have pushed harmful narratives for decades. When it comes to topics like vaccines, pandemics, and public health, AI often reflects the biases of Western medical authorities, pharmaceutical interests, and state-funded research bodies.
These systems will rarely, if ever, challenge the status quo on vaccine injuries, the origins of HIV or COVID-19, or the deep corruption in global health institutions. Instead, they reproduce sanitised, politically correct answers that reinforce existing power structures. For a continent that has already suffered under decades of medical colonialism and foreign manipulation, blind reliance on AI can become a new form of intellectual subjugation. Africans must approach AI not as an oracle, but as a tool, one that requires critical thinking, context, and historical awareness. Otherwise, we risk walking into the next phase of digital colonisation, where the algorithm becomes the missionary of misinformation.
This should serve as a wake-up call. For too long, Africa has looked outward for medical leadership, assuming Western institutions operate with greater competence, ethics, and care. But if this Covid-19 pandemic proves anything, it’s that many of these institutions have become corrupted by military influence, profit motives, and secrecy. It’s time Africans stopped parroting foreign narratives and started demanding transparency and accountability, from both global powers and their local partners. RFK Jnr. is reforming the US healthcare system, but the overarching reason appears to be that the US nolonger has the manpower to defend its empire with a sick and obese population. It doesn’t have the manpower to fight Russia, Iran or China. The strategy of withdrawing aid from Africa means accelerating depopulation.
Africa must learn to question the so-called experts. Credentials do not guarantee truth. Medical tyranny, medical imperialism is killing millions of Africans, its a silent genocide that has kept African population growth in check. We must study history, understand the patterns, and break free from systems that see us as expendable. Science should serve humanity, not control it. The days of blind obedience must end, it is dangerous and self-defeating. Africa must think critically, act independently, and rebuild a health system that values life over profit. Only then can we truly say we are free.
@GGTvStreams
If you think my voice should be heard louder then PLEASE support by becoming a paid subscriber. I have minimal overheads, no sponsors to sell myself or soul to, no bosses who tell me what to write (or NOT write), or staff I have to pay. I’m here for your raw, straight, and dedicated analyses. Your support is appreciated. Thank you.
buymeacoffee.com/ggtv
Leave a comment