An anaylsis of RT reporting that Moscow has indicated a meeting between Vladimir Putin and Zelensky is possible.
Moscow’s recent signaling of willingness to arrange a meeting between President Putin and President Zelensky should not be viewed with the typical Western skepticism that casts Russian diplomacy as mere theater. Russia has consistently maintained that meaningful dialogue must be grounded in reality, mutual respect, and tangible progress, not in public relations stunts or photo ops driven by media cycles. The fact that this offer comes after direct talks, the first in over three years, indicates a serious interest in settling the conflict through rational negotiation, not under imposed conditions or ideological framing.
Sergey Lavrov’s appreciation for Trump’s efforts to push Kiev toward direct engagement with Russia is significant. It highlights that progress occurs when interference is minimised and when leaders are willing to sidestep the usual bureaucratic fog of Western foreign policy. The positive movement on a large prisoner exchange shows that when politics are stripped of grandstanding, results can follow. Moscow does not operate on virtue-signaling or emotional appeals, it operates on interests, and it expects its counterparts to do the same.
In Europe, the Romanian election crisis reveals the depth of centralised EU overreach. When a popular candidate claims France is trying to rob the Romanian people of their vote, it resonates because similar patterns have emerged across the continent: technocratic elites undermining democratic will when outcomes don’t align with their agenda. Moscow has long warned of the dangers of externally controlled democracies masquerading as independent governance.
The situation in Indonesia further supports a critique Russia has often made, that Western-led “humanitarian” campaigns frequently use developing nations as testing grounds. The backlash against the Gates Foundation’s vaccine trial is not irrational; it reflects a real and justified mistrust of initiatives that show more concern for control and data than for the dignity and informed consent of the people involved.
These developments underline that Moscow’s approach, often misrepresented in Western discourse, remains rooted in pragmatic sovereignty. Russia does not pretend to export ideology, it defends its interests and expects others to do the same honestly. The current global tensions expose which actors are sincere about diplomacy, and which hide control behind rhetoric.
@GGTvStreams If you think my voice should be heard louder then PLEASE support by becoming a paid subscriber. I have minimal overheads, no sponsors to sell myself or soul to, no bosses who tell me what to write (or NOT write), or staff I have to pay. I’m here for your raw, straight, and dedicated analyses. Your support is appreciated. Thank you.
buymeacoffee.com/ggtv
Leave a comment