This marks a serious escalation in the conflict
The recent Ukrainian drone strikes on five Russian airbases mark a serious escalation in the conflict and a clear expansion of the battlefield deep into Russian territory. This was the first time Ukraine targeted military infrastructure as far east as Irkutsk and Amur, regions that were previously considered beyond the operational reach of Ukrainian drones. According to Ukrainian sources, the operation, called Spiderweb, was planned for over a year and involved smuggling dozens of first-person view drones into Russia in truck containers. Ukraine claims it used 117 drones and managed to damage or destroy dozens of strategic aircraft, including Tu-95 and Tu-22M bombers and at least one A-50 airborne early warning aircraft.
This attack comes just three days after an apparent attempt on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s helicopter. The timing is not a coincidence. It also comes right before the second round of direct peace talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul, after a three-year pause. It’s hard to see this as anything other than an intentional move to provoke a response, either from the Russian government or from internal factions in Russia who are increasingly frustrated with what they see as the Kremlin’s weak reaction to growing Ukrainian attacks inside the Russian homeland.
There are several things this operation makes clear. First, the Ukrainian security services, with help—likely technical or strategic—from Western intelligence, are capable of reaching deep into Russian territory. They aren’t just hitting military targets near the border or in Crimea. They are now setting up covert operations thousands of kilometers from the frontlines, launching drones from inside Russian territory, and managing to keep them hidden until the moment of attack. That’s a level of sophistication that raises serious questions about how these drones got through Russian counterintelligence and why there were apparently no major air defense responses until it was too late.
Second, the Russian response will likely be severe. If Ukraine did damage or destroy a large portion of Russia’s strategic bomber fleet, that’s not a tactical loss, it’s a strategic one. These aircraft are part of Russia’s nuclear triad. They are built to launch long-range cruise missiles and are tied into Russia’s ability to project power far beyond Ukraine. Russia cannot allow this to go unanswered. A response might come in the form of intensified missile strikes on Ukrainian decision-making centers or covert retaliation against the individuals or units believed to be involved in Spiderweb. Given that Ukrainian leadership, including Zelensky, has reportedly been moved to an undisclosed location, it’s likely they are expecting that kind of response.
Third, this escalation needs to be understood in a broader geopolitical context. The Western powers that have supported Ukraine with training, weapons, and intelligence have not condemned this attack. If anything, they are silent, or quietly supportive. But the timing, the scope, and the precision of this operation suggest it could not have happened without some degree of outside help. It raises the question: what are the larger goals of the governments behind Ukraine’s military? Is this really about defending Ukraine, or is it about provoking Russia into a broader war that could justify an even deeper Western commitment and distract from economic and political instability at home?
Some people argue that the global elite are steering the world toward conflict not to protect democracy or freedom, but to maintain control. With rising unrest in the West, economic decline, and collapsing trust in governments, a major war would create the kind of emergency conditions that allow for digital ID systems, financial tracking, and tighter restrictions on dissent to be rolled out under the justification of national security. Whether or not one accepts this view, it’s clear that many Western governments have used crises in the past to push through policies that would not be accepted in normal times.
Russia will respond, and when it does, the conflict will enter a more dangerous phase. If Moscow decides to treat these strikes as direct attacks enabled by NATO assets, it could target Western surveillance platforms or even logistics centers. That would bring the risk of open confrontation between NATO and Russia closer to reality. It’s also possible that Russia shifts strategy to dismantle Ukrainian command-and-control networks using more aggressive, high-risk operations.
These drone strikes may look like a success for Ukraine in the short term, but they are also lighting a match in a room full of fuel. What comes next will depend on how far the Russian leadership is willing to go and whether the West is prepared to accept the consequences of pushing a nuclear power into a corner. Either way, this was not just another strike. It was a message, and one that will be answered.
All my analyses or reports are free to read, thanks to the generosity of my readers. Independent journalism nonetheless requires investment, so if you value this article or any others, please consider sharing, or even becoming a paid subscriber. Your support is always gratefully received, and will never be forgotten. To buy me a coffee or two, please click this link.
buymeacoffee.com/ggtv
Leave a comment