The GEORGIA GUIDESTONES had the whole agenda written in stone and stated they want to reduce global popn to 500 million. Enter mRNA fake vaccines. Dr. Mary Talley Bowden said on The Joe Rogan Experience:
“They have 500 mRNA shots in the pipeline.”
“33 of those are self-amplifying, which is really terrifying.”
“That means they’re designed to continue to replicate indefinitely.”
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden recently appeared on Joe Rogan’s podcast and made a statement that should be taken seriously by anyone concerned about the direction of modern medicine. According to Bowden, there are currently over 500 new mRNA vaccines in development, with 33 of them classified as “self-amplifying.” These are designed to replicate themselves inside the body over time, possibly indefinitely.
This raises important questions.
Most people were first introduced to mRNA technology during the COVID-19 pandemic, when two emergency-authorized vaccines were rolled out globally. At the time, public health authorities described the technology as a temporary solution to a global crisis. Now, with hundreds more mRNA products reportedly in the pipeline, it is becoming clear that this approach is here to stay, and possibly expand into many areas of routine healthcare.
The idea of self-amplifying vaccines, in particular, deserves public scrutiny. In traditional vaccines, the dose is given once and the body responds to it. With self-amplifying versions, the product is designed to continue reproducing inside the body, potentially over long periods of time. Whether or not this is safe over the long term is still unknown. There is also little discussion in the mainstream about whether people will have the ability to decline such treatments if they become tied to public health campaigns, employment, or travel.
The pace of this development reflects a shift in how global health is being managed. Much of the research and funding for these products comes not from small laboratories or public universities, but from large international organizations, multinational corporations, and private foundations. As medical technology becomes more centralized and uniform across countries, the question becomes: who sets the standards, and who gets to decide what is required?
It is not alarmist to ask whether these developments are being debated properly in public. When technologies advance faster than policy and ethics can keep up, transparency becomes even more important.
mRNA may prove to be a powerful in the future if medical practice is reformed from being a genocide agenda. Tools can be used wisely or recklessly. And when tools are self-replicating and tied to major greedy corporations and institutions with global influence, the margin for error, and the need for accountability, is even more imperative. The experience of the first faked covid pandemic should be a guide when bad actors are charge.
All my analyses or reports are free to read, thanks to the generosity of my readers. Independent journalism nonetheless requires investment, so if you value this article or any others, please consider sharing, or even becoming a paid subscriber. Your support is always gratefully received, and will never be forgotten. To buy me a coffee or two, please click this link.
buymeacoffee.com/ggtv
Leave a comment