Global geopolitics

Pfizer’s own data included the following:

Fifteen thousand women bleeding daily, ten thousand experiencing two periods a month, and seven thousand five hundred recorded as infertile. Post-injection bleeding was reported in ten-year-old girls and eighty-five-year-old women. Breastfeeding infants were reported with vomiting, oedema, fever, inconsolable crying and failure to thrive. One infant died of multi-organ failure after nursing from a vaccinated mother. Two in-utero deaths were attributed by Pfizer to “maternal exposure to the vaccine.”

The report acknowledged that vaccine components could pass into breast milk. Yet three days later, Dr Walensky publicly claimed there was “no bad time” for pregnant or postpartum women to receive the shot.

Pfizer’s internal post-authorisation safety materials include the file “Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorisation Adverse Event Reports,” which records adverse events reported through 28 February 2021 and lists a wide range of neonatal, foetal and lactation-related events. Its appendices include entries such as “death neonatal,” “disseminated intravascular coagulation in newborn” and “foetal placental thrombosis,” along with many other recorded terms.

Independent investigators have extracted the “Pregnancy and Lactation” section from these disclosures and described it as an eight-page cumulative review containing case descriptions for pregnant persons and breastfeeding infants. Naomi Wolf and analysts at DailyClout highlighted the charts in this segment and quoted the recorded figures of menstrual disruption and infertility. Wolf described the pages as “the most appalling eight pages you can imagine” and noted the infant case reports.

The same reporting and commentary pointed to a neonatal death following nursing from a vaccinated mother and two in-utero deaths labelled as “maternal exposure.” Several independent outlets working from the same documents repeated these findings.

Regulatory timelines matter because analysts say the material was supplied to regulators in April 2021, just days before Dr Walensky assured the public that pregnant people should receive the vaccine. In the United Kingdom, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency confirmed receiving enquiries about the cumulative pregnancy and lactation review and stated that safety monitoring, including Yellow Card reports, remained under continual review, while cautioning that Yellow Card entries alone do not prove causation.

Independent commentators have called for public answers from regulators and manufacturers about how these findings were handled. They argue that the presence of neonatal and foetal terms in Pfizer’s safety lists demands explanation.

At the same time, peer-reviewed studies and CDC safety summaries published in 2021 reported no clear signals for adverse pregnancy outcomes in the data sets then available, forming part of the basis for public guidance. These studies remain in the record and show the evidence regulators were citing when making recommendations.

The unresolved question for readers and policymakers is how regulators reconciled these internal entries with the guidance given to pregnant women. Public reporting must establish what the entries represent, whether they were duplicates or unverified reports, and what clinical follow-up revealed about causality. The difference between a spontaneous adverse event report and a confirmed causal relationship carries very great consequence.

Authored By:

Popular Information is powered by readers who believe that truth still matters. When just a few more people step up to support this work, it means more lies exposed, more corruption uncovered, and more accountability where it’s long overdue. If you believe journalism should serve the public, not the powerful, and you’re in a position to help, becoming a PAID SUBSCRIBER truly makes a difference.

buymeacoffee.com/ggtv

https://ko-fi.com/globalgeopolitics