Global geopolitics

Decoding Power. Defying Narratives.


The Road to 1984: Digital Identity, DNA Collection, and the Globalist Agenda

A Call to Resist the Convergence of Surveillance, Biopolitics, and Social Control

While public attention has been diverted toward entertainment and sport, global institutions such as the World Economic Forum (WEF) have been openly discussing the categorisation of individuals based on their genomic data, including the possibility of exclusion from services or rights on the basis of one’s genetic profile. We ignored these psychopaths but they operated in plain sight, discussing the “satanic and evil” future for humanity, even coining it transhumanism. Under no circumstances should governments, corporations, or supranational organisations be granted access to, or control over, the genetic information of citizens. Such practices represent an unprecedented breach of privacy and bodily autonomy and must be prohibited through binding legislation.

Simultaneously, domestic policy proposals, such as the reported plan by the Labour Party to collect and store the DNA of every newborn and link it to a permanent digital identity, raise profound ethical, legal, and human rights concerns. Linking biometric or genetic data to digital identity systems creates the foundation for a pervasive surveillance state. This, in turn, enables authoritarian tools such as vaccine passports, programmable digital currencies, and social credit systems which together would erode civil liberties and eliminate meaningful privacy.

If these systems are allowed to advance unchecked, they will amount to a comprehensive mechanism of social control reminiscent of Orwell’s 1984. The cumulative effect would be the centralisation of power over health, finance, and movement in the hands of unelected global actors and compliant governments. The public must recognise the interconnected nature of these policies, digital IDs, genetic databases, pandemic restrictions, euthanasia debates, and other measures are not isolated phenomena but parts of a convergent framework.

Political leaders such as Keir Starmer may appear to be individual agents, but in this context they function as operatives within a wider globalist strategy coordinated by entities including the WEF, UN Agenda 2030 frameworks, and major state actors such as China. To protect civil liberties, it is imperative to codify prohibitions against the collection, centralisation, and political misuse of personal genetic and biometric data into law before these infrastructures become entrenched. The lesson of history is not hidden, once such powers are established, they are rarely relinquished. The duty to resist this encroachment lies with legislators, independent media, and an informed citizenry. Failure to act now will ensure a system of irreversible surveillance and control for generations to come.

Amazing Polly, in her 2020 video They Hate Us, draws attention to Nita Farahany, an ethicist and long-standing participant at Davos and the WEF. Polly highlights Farahany’s statements in the WEF’s 2016 documentary on the Fourth Industrial Revolution, where she openly discusses the prospect of governments and corporations gaining access to the human brain. Farahany frames neuro-monitoring as part of the trajectory of technological innovation, but Polly rightly underscores the obvious danger: once thoughts can be accessed, recorded, or decoded, people can be punished not for their actions but for their inner life.

This is no joke and if you have never read 1984, you have got to read that book asap. By presenting neural surveillance as a form of workplace management, or even as a tool for law enforcement, Farahany and the WEF normalize the intrusion of political and corporate power into the last domain of privacy, thought itself. When combined with digital ID systems, genomic databases, and financial tracking, the ability to monitor brain activity represents the completion of a total control grid. Speech cannot be free if thought itself is no longer secure. To allow this architecture to advance unchecked is to concede the possibility of a future in which dissent is eliminated before it can even be voiced.

Authored By:

Popular Information is powered by readers who believe that truth still matters. When just a few more people step up to support this work, it means more lies exposed, more corruption uncovered, and more accountability where it’s long overdue. If you believe journalism should serve the public, not the powerful, and you’re in a position to help, becoming a PAID SUBSCRIBER truly makes a difference.

buymeacoffee.com/ggtv

https://ko-fi.com/globalgeopolitics



Leave a comment