Reform UK is not a clean break from the system, it is the system jusf rebranded
What just happened with Nadhim Zahawi exposed something deeply concerning within Reform UK, and it offers a glimpse into the larger global dynamics at play in the ongoing vaccine debate. A journalist asked about the mRNA vaccine rollout, and instead of answering the question, Zahawi and Farage chose to attack the question itself.
Why?
Because the truth is a politically radioactive bomb and it’s a truth that transcends national borders.
Let’s break down the key paid to play players:
Nadhim Zahawi
He was the Conservative minister who led the UK’s Covid vaccine rollout, which was one of the most extensive mRNA campaigns in modern British history. The policies implemented under his watch, mandates, coercion, travel restrictions, and social pressure, mirror the heavy-handed tactics seen in other countries, including the United States. Now, Zahawi is being welcomed into Reform UK as if the past never happened. This move sends a troubling signal that Reform UK is more interested in rebranding the system than challenging it. He has not defected , he has been relocated.
Dr. David Bull – Reform’s chairman.
Bull has long praised mass vaccination campaigns and defended the official Covid programme, aligning himself with establishment medicine rather than critics. This raises significant questions about Reform UK’s supposed commitment to “free speech” on health, especially in the context of growing global opposition to the mainstream narrative. If Reform’s leadership is so entrenched in the establishment view on vaccines, how can they credibly claim to represent the rising tide of vaccine scepticism sweeping across the Western world?
So, this label of “vaccine skepticism” or “vaccine hesitancy”, is also known as anti-vaccination or anti-vax, which is a reluctance or refusal to be vaccinated or to have one’s children vaccinated against contagious diseases despite the availability of the vaccination services that do not comply with informed consent.
Richard Rice – Reform’s former leader.
Tice openly supported the government’s vaccine programme, vaccine passports, and punitive measures for those who refused the jab. His stance aligned with the authoritarian responses to the pandemic witnessed across the West, including the United States.
This is not resistance to the system; it’s compliance. And it echoes the broader geopolitical divide between those defending the old order and those who are challenging it.
So, when a journalist dared to ask whether Reform UK questions the mRNA rollout, Zahawi’s response was to call it a “stupid question.”
Why wouldn’t he react that way? Reform UK is trying to present itself as the voice of vaccine sceptics, yet its leadership consists of those who were architects of the very system they now claim to oppose. This is not unity, people are being duped again, it’s the same deception by the same sadistic power.
But there’s a larger, more significant geopolitical element at play here. In the United States, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has emerged as a leading figure in challenging the vaccine narrative. His efforts have sparked a major shift in public discourse around the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Kennedy’s campaign is not just about questioning mRNA vaccines, it’s about challenging the entire pharmaceutical-industrial complex, which has long operated with minimal oversight and accountability. His stance has catalyzed a significant portion of the electorate, drawing attention to the collusion between big pharma and government bodies, much like we’ve seen in the UK with Zahawi.
On the legal front, Aaron Siri, a prominent lawyer who has taken on numerous cases against the vaccine industry, has been instrumental in exposing the flaws and lack of transparency in vaccine policies. His victories in court have not only exposed the legal vulnerabilities of vaccine manufacturers but have also empowered a growing coalition of individuals and groups fighting for greater accountability. This movement is becoming more coordinated and vocal globally, not just in the U.S., but in Europe and elsewhere.
So when Reform UK, with its leadership embedded in the very system that championed mass vaccination, claims to represent the people’s freedom, it rings hollow. The UK’s attempt to rebrand itself as a populist force against “authoritarian health policy” seems disingenuous when its leadership consists of the architects of that very policy.
This is not just about Reform UK but a part of a broader geopolitical struggle over who controls health policy, who holds power over public discourse, and how global movements are reshaping the future of medicine and freedom.
Reform UK is not a clean break from the system. It is the system, rebranded, a system that is now facing increasing scrutiny on the global stage from people like RFK Jr., Aaron Siri, and countless others.
Reform UK is being called out: You cannot build a freedom movement by importing the architects of an authoritarian genocidal health policy. You cannot claim to oppose the system while still defending its most controversial policies. And you cannot ignore the growing global tide of resistance to the medical-industrial complex. Reform UK’s attempt to play both sides will ultimately expose them as part of the very establishment they claim to oppose.
Authored By: Global GeoPolitics
This is a reader-supported publication. I cannot do this without your support. If you believe journalism should serve the public, not the powerful, and you’re in a position to help, becoming a PAID SUBSCRIBER truly makes a difference. Alternatively you can support by way of a donation or cup of coffee:
buymeacoffee.com/ggtv
Leave a comment