zero enrichment dispute
-
War Decided: Who Throws the First Punch
Netanyahu’s Closing Horizon But Washington Prefers Israel to Strike, and How Political Liability Is Being Engineered Before Escalation Senior advisers to President Donald Trump have signalled, in reporting carried by Politico, that an Israeli first strike on Iran would provide a more favourable political predicate for subsequent American entry into war. Officials familiar with internal… Continue reading
AI and Digital Control, America, China, economics, Energy, EUROPE, Financial markets, Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Global Finance, israel, middle east, Mineral Resources, NATO, politics, reserve currency, warBalkanisation doctrine, bipartisan foreign policy consensus, Brzeziński grand strategy, carrier strike group movements, Chinese satellite intelligence, CM-302 missiles, congressional war authority, F-22 deployment, first strike doctrine, Fordow nuclear facility, Geneva nuclear talks, great power competition, Hezbollah escalation risk, Isfahan nuclear complex, Israel–Iran conflict, Israeli security doctrine, Middle East power realignment, munitions depletion risk, Natanz nuclear site, Netanyahu security architecture, pre-emptive strategy, regime change strategy, Taiwan contingency planning, US foreign policy, US–China strategic rivalry, US–Iran war, USS Gerald R Ford, War Powers Resolution, war sequencing, zero enrichment dispute
