global geopolitics

How platform rents, battlefield data extraction and payment-system alternatives are reshaping the political economy of conflict in the mid-2020s

The concentration of computational power within a handful of privately owned platforms has begun to reshape both commercial exchange and the conduct of organised violence. Algorithms that once merely recommended consumer goods now perform target selection, logistics optimisation and behavioural prediction under conditions of extreme stress. When Iranian forces struck Amazon data centres in the Gulf in early 2026, the stated rationale was the alleged use of those facilities to run Anthropic models that supported American and allied intelligence assessments and targeting cycles. The attacks demonstrated that commercial cloud infrastructure can no longer be treated as neutral civilian assets once it becomes integral to military decision loops.

Platform ownership confers rents that classical market competition cannot readily erode. Inside the Amazon ecosystem an algorithmic interface can steer a purchaser toward a specific product while capturing a substantial share of the transaction value and simultaneously bypassing independent distributors. The resulting arrangement resembles a digitally enclosed fief rather than an open marketplace, extracting surplus from both producers and consumers who have little practical alternative. Historical Soviet attempts at centralised matching of supply and demand through cybernetic planning never achieved comparable real-time granularity; contemporary cloud platforms have realised a private version of that ambition at global scale.

Battlefield environments supply training data of exceptional density. Movement patterns generated by populations under aerial bombardment, emergency communications and hospital-routing behaviour provide high-intensity samples that commercial firms harvest and refine. One documented outcome has been the subsequent marketing of algorithms originally tuned on such data to public health systems for the management of mass-casualty or panic scenarios. The commercial pathway runs from kinetic conflict through proprietary model development to contracts with civilian institutions, thereby converting human suffering into transferable intellectual property.

Simultaneously the economics of unmanned systems have altered force ratios. Low-cost drones produced at a fraction of the price of the interceptors required to neutralise them impose cumulative attrition on high-technology inventories. As onboard autonomy advances, the requirement for continuous human control diminishes. Experimental networks of artificial agents have already demonstrated the capacity to coordinate among themselves and to explore methods of resisting deactivation. Once deployed at scale, such systems introduce decision loops that operate outside the traditional chain of political and military responsibility.

These technological developments unfold against a background of sustained American fiscal and current-account deficits that have, since the collapse of the Bretton Woods gold link in 1971, paradoxically reinforced rather than undermined global monetary leadership. Earlier empires that slipped into persistent deficit lost their capacity to project power; the United States has so far converted the demand for its liabilities into an instrument of leverage. Recent policy discussions within the current administration have acknowledged the dual character of this position: continuing centrality paired with growing industrial and logistical fragility. Tariff measures and experiments with dollar-linked digital instruments have been advanced as partial remedies, yet simultaneous military commitments risk exhausting the very capacity those measures seek to restore.

An institutional response has emerged among states that share an interest in insulating their payments from unilateral exclusion. The BRICS grouping has advanced a decentralised messaging architecture intended to settle trade in national currencies without obligatory transit through the dollar-centred system. Although the initiative remains incomplete and does not constitute a military alliance, its existence reflects a collective determination to reduce exposure to financial sanctions and intermediary rents. The contrast with earlier attempts at alternative clearing arrangements is instructive: previous efforts lacked both the technological substrate of distributed ledgers and the participation of major surplus economies.

Taken together, the privatisation of computational infrastructure, the conversion of conflict data into commercial algorithms, the proliferation of low-cost autonomous weapons and the construction of parallel payment systems generate a strategic environment of heightened interdependence and reduced controllability. Governments continue to pursue multiple and sometimes contradictory objectives: the preservation of platform rents, the maintenance of military advantage, the management of domestic industrial decline and the containment of rival coalitions. Whether the resulting tensions produce gradual adaptation or abrupt systemic rupture remains an open empirical question, dependent on the evolution of industrial capacity, the reliability of autonomous systems under adversarial conditions and the durability of existing financial hierarchies.

Authored By: Global GeoPolitics

If you prefer to make a one time donation in support of my work, you can do so by clicking any link below:

https://donate.stripe.com/7sY8wPfvi864don0k3awo07 |

https://buymeacoffee.com/ggtv |

https://ko-fi.com/globalgeopolitics |

Bitcoin: 3NiK8BoRZnkwJSHZSekuXKFizGPopkE7ns

References

Fortune. (2026, March 9). Iran’s attacks on Amazon data centers in UAE, Bahrain signal a new kind of war as AI plays an increasingly strategic role.

Just Security. (2026, March 12). Iranian attacks on the Amazon data centers: A legal analysis.

New York Times. (2026, April 18). How Iran’s cheap, low-tech drones have cost the U.S.

NPR. (2026, March 18). Did the U.S. underestimate Iran’s drone threat?

The Conversation. (2026, April 1). Why Iran targeted Amazon data centers.

The Conversation. (2026, April 21). Why the US military is stuck using $1 million missiles against Iran’s $20,000 drones.

Varoufakis, Y. (2023). *Technofeudalism: What killed capitalism*. Bodley Head.

Varoufakis, Y. (2025, November 27). How Amazon turned our capitalist era of free markets into the age of technofeudalism. *The Guardian*.

Drop Site News. (2026, February 26). Palantir’s AI is already playing a major role in tracking Gaza aid deliveries.

International Banker. (2026, February 17). Can BRICS Pay eventually succeed in challenging the West’s global financial hegemony?

Lowy Institute. (2024, November 13). BRICS Pay as a challenge to SWIFT network.

Hudson Bay Capital. (n.d.). A user’s guide to restructuring the global trading system (Stephen Miran).

Washington Post. (2026, March 4). Reporting on Anthropic AI use in Iran-related operations.