COVID-19
-
NEW STUDY PURPORTS TO SHOW EFFECTIVENESS OF UPDATED COVID BOOSTER IN 2025 — START WITH THE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES
Before accepting the conclusions, examine who funded the research, how the data were analyzed, and what the study did not measure NEW STUDY PURPORTS TO SHOW EFFECTIVENESS OF UPDATED COVID BOOSTER IN 2025 — START WITH THE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES A new study is generating media headlines, claiming to demonstrate the effectiveness of yet… Continue reading
-
The Great Pandemic Cover-Up
Leaked emails expose how a network of government agencies, global organizations, and pharmaceutical interests prepared for the next outbreak and efforts to silence dissent long before COVID-19. A collection of internal emails from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) has revealed years of planning for future pandemics involving governments, foundations, international organizations, and pharmaceutical… Continue reading
bill & melinda gates foundation, bill gates, biomedical research, conspiracy theories, COVID-19, ecohealth alliance, Government transparency, infectious disease control, Misinformation, National Institutes of Health, NIH, pandemic response, public health policy, regulatory oversight, research ethics, scientific research funding, vaccine development -
The Great Pandemic Cover-Up
Leaked emails expose how a network of government agencies, global organizations, and pharmaceutical interests prepared for the next outbreak and efforts to silence dissent long before COVID-19. A collection of internal emails from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) has revealed years of planning for future pandemics involving governments, foundations, international organizations, and pharmaceutical… Continue reading
bill & melinda gates foundation, bill gates, biomedical research, conspiracy theories, COVID-19, ecohealth alliance, Government transparency, infectious disease control, Misinformation, National Institutes of Health, NIH, pandemic response, public health policy, regulatory oversight, research ethics, scientific research funding, vaccine development -
Ban on Chinese Scientists Scrapped at NeurIPS After Backlash
Sanctions frameworks and conference gatekeeping operate as political tools in shaping scientific access, funding, and global AI competition Reversal of a ban on Chinese researchers by United States-based organizers of NeurIPS has exposed the degree to which geopolitical competition now shapes access to core scientific infrastructure in artificial intelligence, a field central to economic and… Continue reading
AI and Digital Control, America, China, economics, Energy, EUROPE, Financial markets, Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Global Finance, iran, israel, NATO, politics, reserve currency, Russia, waracademic freedom, AI, AI competition, AI supremacy, artificial intelligence, China, Chinese scientists, compliance, conference governance, COVID-19, Geopolitics, global research, Huawei, ICLR, ICML, innovation, institutional control, knowledge economy, legal frameworks, machine learning, NeurIPS, peer review, research bans, research funding, sanctions, science policy, scientific publishing, technology policy, United States, US-China relations
