AI competition
-
๐๐จ๐ฐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐.๐. ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐ญ ๐.๐. ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐๐ญ ๐๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ฎ | ๐๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ฃ๐๐๐ค๐๐
DARPA funds the research. AI research.They fund it inside military labs and university research centers.ย And then at the right moment, they hand it to the private sector. They put a friendly name on it. They build a nice logo. They run some commercials. And they make it feel like it came from a garage… Continue reading
-
The President Changes. The Strategy Doesnโt
American Primacy, Structural Entrenchment, and the Path to Permanent Conflict On 8 March 1992, the New York Times published a front-page report under the headline โU.S. Strategy Plan Calls for Insuring No Rivals Develop,โ based on a leaked draft of the Pentagonโs Defense Planning Guidance for fiscal years 1994 to 1999. The document, drafted under… Continue reading
AI and Digital Control, America, China, economics, EUROPE, Financial markets, Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Global Finance, iran, israel, middle east, Mineral Resources, NATO, politics, reserve currency, Russia, war$1.5 trillion defence spending, AI competition, American exceptionalism, American population, American primacy, anti-ship missiles, arms procurement, Asian energy dependency, AUKUS, Boeing, Brian Berletic, British Empire, burden sharing, China containment, Chinese education, Chomsky, CIA drone operations, controlled demolition, corporate capture, corporate extraction, defence budget, Defense Planning Guidance 1992, Dick Cheney, domestic austerity, economic nationalism, escalation, Force Design 2030, General David Berger, General Dynamics, geopolitical analysis, Georgetown CSET, Grand Bargain, great power competition, hegemonic decline, Herman, historical precedent, I. Lewis Libby, ideological indoctrination, imperial overextension, Indo-Pacific strategy, Iran war 2026, japan, LNG markets, Lockheed Martin, manufacturing consent, Marine Littoral Regiments, media distraction, Middle East energy disruption, military industrial complex, multipolar world, national debt, National Science Board, National Security Strategy 2025, New Eastern Outlook, NMESIS, no rivals develop, Northrop Grumman, One Big Beautiful Bill, One China policy, Paul Wolfowitz, perpetual conflict, petrodollar, Philippines, political theatre, post-Cold War strategy, proxy warfare, RAND Corporation, Raytheon, reindustrialisation, rent-seeking economy, reserve currency, Russian energy blockade, science and engineering indicators, semiconductors, Senate Armed Services Committee, shareholder primacy, social spending cuts, South Korea, Soviet collapse, STEM graduates, Strait of Hormuz, structural entrenchment, taiwan, tariffs, technological competition, think tank policy, Trump foreign policy, Ukraine proxy war, unipolarity, US dollar hegemony, wall street, Wolfowitz Doctrine, workforce competition, world war risk -
Ban on Chinese Scientists Scrapped at NeurIPS After Backlash
Sanctions frameworks and conference gatekeeping operate as political tools in shaping scientific access, funding, and global AI competition Reversal of a ban on Chinese researchers by United States-based organizers of NeurIPS has exposed the degree to which geopolitical competition now shapes access to core scientific infrastructure in artificial intelligence, a field central to economic and… Continue reading
AI and Digital Control, America, China, economics, Energy, EUROPE, Financial markets, Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Global Finance, iran, israel, NATO, politics, reserve currency, Russia, waracademic freedom, AI, AI competition, AI supremacy, artificial intelligence, China, Chinese scientists, compliance, conference governance, COVID-19, Geopolitics, global research, Huawei, ICLR, ICML, innovation, institutional control, knowledge economy, legal frameworks, machine learning, NeurIPS, peer review, research bans, research funding, sanctions, science policy, scientific publishing, technology policy, United States, US-China relations
