no rivals develop
-
The President Changes. The Strategy Doesn’t
American Primacy, Structural Entrenchment, and the Path to Permanent Conflict On 8 March 1992, the New York Times published a front-page report under the headline “U.S. Strategy Plan Calls for Insuring No Rivals Develop,” based on a leaked draft of the Pentagon’s Defense Planning Guidance for fiscal years 1994 to 1999. The document, drafted under… Continue reading
AI and Digital Control, America, China, economics, EUROPE, Financial markets, Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Global Finance, iran, israel, middle east, Mineral Resources, NATO, politics, reserve currency, Russia, war$1.5 trillion defence spending, AI competition, American exceptionalism, American population, American primacy, anti-ship missiles, arms procurement, Asian energy dependency, AUKUS, Boeing, Brian Berletic, British Empire, burden sharing, China containment, Chinese education, Chomsky, CIA drone operations, controlled demolition, corporate capture, corporate extraction, defence budget, Defense Planning Guidance 1992, Dick Cheney, domestic austerity, economic nationalism, escalation, Force Design 2030, General David Berger, General Dynamics, geopolitical analysis, Georgetown CSET, Grand Bargain, great power competition, hegemonic decline, Herman, historical precedent, I. Lewis Libby, ideological indoctrination, imperial overextension, Indo-Pacific strategy, Iran war 2026, japan, LNG markets, Lockheed Martin, manufacturing consent, Marine Littoral Regiments, media distraction, Middle East energy disruption, military industrial complex, multipolar world, national debt, National Science Board, National Security Strategy 2025, New Eastern Outlook, NMESIS, no rivals develop, Northrop Grumman, One Big Beautiful Bill, One China policy, Paul Wolfowitz, perpetual conflict, petrodollar, Philippines, political theatre, post-Cold War strategy, proxy warfare, RAND Corporation, Raytheon, reindustrialisation, rent-seeking economy, reserve currency, Russian energy blockade, science and engineering indicators, semiconductors, Senate Armed Services Committee, shareholder primacy, social spending cuts, South Korea, Soviet collapse, STEM graduates, Strait of Hormuz, structural entrenchment, taiwan, tariffs, technological competition, think tank policy, Trump foreign policy, Ukraine proxy war, unipolarity, US dollar hegemony, wall street, Wolfowitz Doctrine, workforce competition, world war risk
