hegemonic decline
-
The Terminal Contradictions of American Empire
How the structural vulnerabilities of dollar hegemony, the shadow banking system, and geopolitical overextension are converging to produce an irreversible crisis of the capitalist order Editorial Analysis | September 2026 The American empire is not merely experiencing a cyclical downturn but is entering a terminal phase of structural decline in which the contradictions that have… Continue reading
-
The Anxiety of a Hegemon – Why America Cannot Stop Saying It Is Still Ahead
The ritualistic declarations of continued primacy reveal a deeper structural crisis that no amount of reassurance can conceal Editorial Analysis | September 2026 The most revealing aspect of contemporary American discourse about China is not the substance of the claims but the frequency and ritualistic character of their repetition. For decades, the United States was… Continue reading
AI and Digital Control, America, bond market, China, covid pandemic, economics, Energy, EUROPE, Financial markets, Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Global Finance, imperialism, iran, israel, japan, knowledge, Mineral Resources, NATO, neocolonialism, politics, Russia, satellites, technology, Vaccines, war -
The Unipolar Delusion and the Return of Great-Power Politics: Why Western Escalation Reflects Panic Rather Than Strength
Editorial Analysis | September 2026 The collapse of the Soviet Union produced a distribution of global power that left Washington in effective control of the international system. That concentration of power, combined with the desire to maintain it in perpetuity, created structural incentives that shaped American foreign policy for three decades. One side emerged from… Continue reading
-
The President Changes. The Strategy Doesn’t
American Primacy, Structural Entrenchment, and the Path to Permanent Conflict On 8 March 1992, the New York Times published a front-page report under the headline “U.S. Strategy Plan Calls for Insuring No Rivals Develop,” based on a leaked draft of the Pentagon’s Defense Planning Guidance for fiscal years 1994 to 1999. The document, drafted under… Continue reading
AI and Digital Control, America, China, economics, EUROPE, Financial markets, Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Global Finance, iran, israel, middle east, Mineral Resources, NATO, politics, reserve currency, Russia, war$1.5 trillion defence spending, AI competition, American exceptionalism, American population, American primacy, anti-ship missiles, arms procurement, Asian energy dependency, AUKUS, Boeing, Brian Berletic, British Empire, burden sharing, China containment, Chinese education, Chomsky, CIA drone operations, controlled demolition, corporate capture, corporate extraction, defence budget, Defense Planning Guidance 1992, Dick Cheney, domestic austerity, economic nationalism, escalation, Force Design 2030, General David Berger, General Dynamics, geopolitical analysis, Georgetown CSET, Grand Bargain, great power competition, hegemonic decline, Herman, historical precedent, I. Lewis Libby, ideological indoctrination, imperial overextension, Indo-Pacific strategy, Iran war 2026, japan, LNG markets, Lockheed Martin, manufacturing consent, Marine Littoral Regiments, media distraction, Middle East energy disruption, military industrial complex, multipolar world, national debt, National Science Board, National Security Strategy 2025, New Eastern Outlook, NMESIS, no rivals develop, Northrop Grumman, One Big Beautiful Bill, One China policy, Paul Wolfowitz, perpetual conflict, petrodollar, Philippines, political theatre, post-Cold War strategy, proxy warfare, RAND Corporation, Raytheon, reindustrialisation, rent-seeking economy, reserve currency, Russian energy blockade, science and engineering indicators, semiconductors, Senate Armed Services Committee, shareholder primacy, social spending cuts, South Korea, Soviet collapse, STEM graduates, Strait of Hormuz, structural entrenchment, taiwan, tariffs, technological competition, think tank policy, Trump foreign policy, Ukraine proxy war, unipolarity, US dollar hegemony, wall street, Wolfowitz Doctrine, workforce competition, world war risk -
Iran – The Last Window of Empire to Stop Multipolarity
Why the War on Iran Signals a Final Attempt to Halt Multipolarity Before It Becomes Irreversible A structural rupture in the international system is already underway, and its trajectory has become effectively irreversible. The confrontation centred on Iran constitutes not a regional escalation but a terminal phase in the enforcement of a unipolar order that… Continue reading
AI and Digital Control, America, China, economics, Energy, EUROPE, Financial markets, Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Global Finance, iran, israel, Latin America, middle east, Mineral Resources, NATO, politics, reserve currency, Russia, South East Asia, warChina Strategy, de-dollarisation, economic warfare., energy geopolitics, Game Theory, Geopolitics, global energy markets, global order, grand strategy, great power competition, hegemonic decline, imperial strategy, international relations theory, Iran conflict, Middle East geopolitics, multipolarity, petrodollar system, political economy, proxy warfare, Russia strategy, sanctions, Strategic Competition, systemic risk, unipolarity, US foreign policy
