Indo-Pacific strategy
-
The President Changes. The Strategy Doesn’t
American Primacy, Structural Entrenchment, and the Path to Permanent Conflict On 8 March 1992, the New York Times published a front-page report under the headline “U.S. Strategy Plan Calls for Insuring No Rivals Develop,” based on a leaked draft of the Pentagon’s Defense Planning Guidance for fiscal years 1994 to 1999. The document, drafted under… Continue reading
AI and Digital Control, America, China, economics, EUROPE, Financial markets, Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Global Finance, iran, israel, middle east, Mineral Resources, NATO, politics, reserve currency, Russia, war$1.5 trillion defence spending, AI competition, American exceptionalism, American population, American primacy, anti-ship missiles, arms procurement, Asian energy dependency, AUKUS, Boeing, Brian Berletic, British Empire, burden sharing, China containment, Chinese education, Chomsky, CIA drone operations, controlled demolition, corporate capture, corporate extraction, defence budget, Defense Planning Guidance 1992, Dick Cheney, domestic austerity, economic nationalism, escalation, Force Design 2030, General David Berger, General Dynamics, geopolitical analysis, Georgetown CSET, Grand Bargain, great power competition, hegemonic decline, Herman, historical precedent, I. Lewis Libby, ideological indoctrination, imperial overextension, Indo-Pacific strategy, Iran war 2026, japan, LNG markets, Lockheed Martin, manufacturing consent, Marine Littoral Regiments, media distraction, Middle East energy disruption, military industrial complex, multipolar world, national debt, National Science Board, National Security Strategy 2025, New Eastern Outlook, NMESIS, no rivals develop, Northrop Grumman, One Big Beautiful Bill, One China policy, Paul Wolfowitz, perpetual conflict, petrodollar, Philippines, political theatre, post-Cold War strategy, proxy warfare, RAND Corporation, Raytheon, reindustrialisation, rent-seeking economy, reserve currency, Russian energy blockade, science and engineering indicators, semiconductors, Senate Armed Services Committee, shareholder primacy, social spending cuts, South Korea, Soviet collapse, STEM graduates, Strait of Hormuz, structural entrenchment, taiwan, tariffs, technological competition, think tank policy, Trump foreign policy, Ukraine proxy war, unipolarity, US dollar hegemony, wall street, Wolfowitz Doctrine, workforce competition, world war risk -
Kagan and Boot: The Guilty Are Writing the Verdict (Extended Version)
From Tehran to Taiwan: The Men Who Built America’s Empire Are Now Writing Its Autopsy The extraordinary significance of the Max Boot interview with former CIA analyst John Culver does not rest merely in the military assessments themselves, severe as they already appear. The deeper significance rests in who is speaking, where they are speaking,… Continue reading
AI and Digital Control, America, China, East Africa, economics, Energy, Financial markets, Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Global Finance, iran, israel, NATO, politics, reserve currency, warAmerican decline, American empire, American Power, Atlanticism, Belt and Road Initiative, China, containment strategy, de-dollarisation, defence policy, empire, energy politics, Eurasia, Eurasian integration, Geopolitics, Geostrategy, global hegemony, global order, great power competition, imperial overstretch, Indo-Pacific, Indo-Pacific strategy, Industrial Capacity, international relations, iran, John Culver, maritime power, Max Boot, military industrial complex, Military Primacy, military strategy, multipolar world order, NATO, Neoconservatism, petrodollar, political economy, Project for the New American Century, Robert Kagan, Russia, sanctions, South China Sea, Strait of Hormuz, Strategic Competition, Strategic Decline, taiwan, Taiwan Strait, Ukraine war, unipolarity, US foreign policy, US Hegemony, US Navy, US-China relations, Washington Consensus, West Asia -
Israel as Distraction, China as Target: The Structure of an Emerging Systemic War
How regional conflict obscures a larger strategy targeting China’s economic lifelines Something has already changed in the way power is organised, though it is rarely put plainly. The pattern of events still looks familiar, which is why it is easy to miss. Military movements in the Middle East are usually explained in terms of local… Continue reading
AI and Digital Control, America, China, economics, Energy, EUROPE, Financial markets, Foreign Policy, Geopolitics, Global Finance, iran, israel, middle east, Mineral Resources, NATO, politics, reserve currency, Russia, waranti-access area denial, blockade strategy, China containment, coercive diplomacy, economic warfare., energy security, Game Theory, Geopolitics, global trade routes, grand strategy, great power competition, hegemonic stability, Indo-Pacific strategy, international relations theory, iran, Marine Corps restructuring, maritime chokepoints, Middle East conflict, military doctrine, multipolar world order, naval strategy, political economy, resource control, Russia-China relations, strategic encirclement, supply chain security, systemic war, US foreign policy
